OneTwoLoop can assess your engineering skills and build an anonymized dossier. It’s opt-in, you preview anything before it’s public, and you can opt out entirely at any time. Read exactly how we rate →
Loading
01 · Consent
What we may do
Notice at collection. We keep a private skill assessment for members as internal recruiter notes, it is never published on its own, and we do not rank or compare people with it. The choices below control everything beyond that, and you can opt out of assessment completely with the last switch.
Rate my skills and build my public Guild profile
The affirmative opt-in. Turns on a full, cited assessment and lets you preview your Guild profile later. Separate from being listed in the network. Nothing goes public until you preview it yourself and click publish.
Use my resume & role history as evidence
First-class input, including for the top levels. Without it we lean on public signals, which under-rates proprietary-work seniors.
Use my self-attestation below as evidence
Lets the assessment read the work you describe in section 02. Owner-only; only you can see or edit it.
Generate a draft dossier for me to preview
For your eyes only. You review every claim and its cited evidence, correct or suppress anything, and decide whether to publish. This lets you preview a draft. Publishing is a separate, explicit step.
Allow my rating to inform hiring opens after our first bias audit
Disabled for now. Any hiring use is governed by a real adverse-impact audit modeled on NYC’s Local Law 144; this opens only once that audit is completed and published. A human makes every introduction.
Email me before any first publish and on methodology changes
So your consent stays informed over time.
Don’t assess me at all
Turns off every assessment, including the private internal one, and our pipeline reads this flag first so it sticks across future runs. You stay in the network, this only governs rating.
Anonymity is enforced by process: we remove direct identifiers (name, face, GitHub handle, employer), run an automated re-identification check, and a human reviews framing before anything publishes. Withdraw or erase anytime, we unpublish within 72 hours and keep only a minimal dated record that you consented and withdrew.
02 · Self-attestation
Tell us what you shipped, especially what GitHub can’t see
The best work, bank-grade contracts, internal platforms, regulated or NDA’d systems, never hits a public repo. This is your evidence locker, in your words. It’s private and owner-only; filling it in is not consent to be rated or published.
Roles, the systems you owned, scope and constraints (scale, security, regulation). Abstract employer names if you prefer.
Claim a level 1-5 and back each one with a line of evidence. 1 Exposure · 2 Working use · 3 Independent delivery · 4 Senior ownership · 5 Domain authority.
No judgment, this is the norm for senior, proprietary work. Tell us where your real work lives so the assessment isn’t penalized for code it was never allowed to see.
One per line, papers, talks, patents, GitLab, Kaggle, anything checkable.
